|
|
Syllabus
HUMN-303—INTRODUCTION TO
THE HUMANITIES—accelerated
Fall 2005
Faculty Information:
Dr. Al Campbell
E-mail:
acampbell@tp.devry.edu
campbell@wolverton-mountain.com
Web Site:
www.wolverton-mountain.com
(for PowerPoint Presentations)
Phone: (219) 928.5598 or (219) 942.5595
Course Identification:
Credit hours: 3
Contact hours: 3
Days/hours course meets: Thursdays 6:-9:50pm
Prerequisite: ENGL-135
|
|
Required Texts |
Fiero, Gloria K. The Humanistic Tradition. Volume II The Early
Modern Age to the Present. Fourth Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2002
Sporre, Dennis J. Perceiving the Arts. An Introduction to the
Humanities (8th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson
Publishing, 2006. |
|
|
Course Description |
This course introduces students to vital areas of the humanities, such
as history, philosophy, literature, and the visual and performing arts.
Students analyze and evaluate cultural artifacts (such as paintings,
poetry, music, film, and architecture) and develop connections among
these works and their historical and philosophical contexts.
Discussions, writings, oral presentations, group activities, and visits
to cultural venues prepare students for more advanced inquiry in
subsequent courses. |
|
|
Terminal Course Objectives |
Every DeVry course is guided by specific learning objectives, objectives
that serve as the road map to both course instruction and student
learning. These objectives, called Terminal Course Objectives (TCOs),
assist in making the necessary connections between our society, our
culture, and various artistic manifestations. After completing this
course you should be able to exercise the following skills:
-
Given a representation of an artwork (such as a painting, poem,
sonata, or cathedral), analyze the work’s content, form, materials,
meaning, and method of creation to enrich understanding of and
appreciation for that work.
-
Given a representation of an artwork (such as a painting, poem,
sonata, or cathedral) and a critical interpretation or statement of
aesthetics, evaluate the artwork against the interpretation or
statement, in order to show differing critical and aesthetic
perspectives on the artwork.
-
Given representations of two artworks of similar or differing
disciplines (such as two paintings or a painting and a poem),
compare/contrast their contents, forms, and/or methods of creation,
to identify the scope of the respective disciplines and to clarify
disciplinary differences.
-
Given representations of multiple artworks, classify them using a
variety of approaches (by discipline, genre, style, period, etc.),
to demonstrate ability to contextualize the works.
-
Given a representation of an artwork and a particular summary of the
time period when the work was produced (such as the Mona Lisa and a
history of the Italian Renaissance), formulate relationships between
the work and its historical context to augment understanding and
appreciation for both the artwork and the time period.
-
Given information about a cultural phenomenon (such as an artwork,
an issue, a trend, or a social/personal value) and documents
describing a philosophical school of thought (such as theism,
enlightenment humanism, existentialism, or French postmodernism),
analyze the relationships between the cultural phenomenon and the
school of thought.
-
Given a significant technological advance (such as the printing
press or camera), assess the effects of the technical breakthrough
on culture and art.
-
Given documents describing a particular society (such as classical
Greece or Victorian England), evaluate the role and purpose of one
area of the humanities in that society.
-
Given a variety of philosophical positions (such as Classical
Humanism, Existentialism, Pragmatism, or Postmodernism) and specific
philosophical issues (such as epistemology, ethics, or esthetics),
critique differences among the positions in regard to the issue.
-
Given a specific social conflict or moral dilemma (such as
euthanasia, abortion, or social welfare), apply a particular ethical
perspective to propose a solution or course of action.
|
|
|
Course Schedule |
Week |
TCOs |
Onsite Work |
Online Work |
Homework |
1
|
1
|
Introductions
Review of the syllabus and course overview
Orientation to the iOptimize course format
Online course component login and navigation
Selection/first meeting of the research teams.
Topics for discussion:
What is art? Art as abstract notion and art as personal
experience. Personal experiences with art. Definitions of
art. The role of art and artistic expression on a personal and
social level. Possible origins of art, the relation between art
and technology, and uses of the arts.
Q & A |
Read the introductory lecture
Threaded discussions:
Introductions
What is your favorite work of art? Why do you like this
particular work? If you do not like any work of art, pick one
at random. Examine your reaction to the work. After reading
the introductory lecture, analyze your reaction. How do you
explain this reaction?
Research team meetings
|
Read: Sporre: Ch. 1 “Introduction. What are the Arts and How
Do We Respond to Them?” (1-26).
|
2
|
1, 2, 9.
|
Review of last week's online work
Quiz 1
Topics for discussion:
Meaning in art, literature, and music. Making sense of the
world and making sense of art. Relation between art and
philosophy as two ways of making sense of nature and culture.
Relationship between meaning and enjoyment of art. Focus on
modernist art and poetry. Learn terminology to discuss visual
arts.
Q & A |
Read Lecture 2
Threaded discussions
Compare what Jean Paul Sartre says in the excerpt to what Plato
and Aristotle have to say on the subject.
Consider the elements that the three excerpts have in common.
Examine the way in which the three philosophers conceptualize
human nature, will, and moral choice.
Consider the picture by Helen Frankenthaler. What is your first
reaction? In what ways can we make sense of it? What time
period do you think it belongs to? Which of the principles
governing visual arts (described in Sporre) apply here?
Research team meetings |
Read : Sporre: Ch. 2 "Pictures: Printmaking, and Photography"
(27-68).
Fiero: Ch. 35 “The Quest for Meaning” (886-908).
Choose topic for project. |
3
|
3,4,5,6 |
Review of last week’s online work.
Quiz 2
Topics for discussion:
The relation between specific works of art and culture as a
whole. Intrinsic and extrinsic meaning (or form and
content/context) and the relationship between them. Relation
between the arts and the sciences. Focus on the Baroque period.
Learn terminology to discuss music.
Q & A |
Read Lecture 3
Threaded discussions
In his Discourse on Method, Descartes speaks about the
arts in the passage quoted. What is Descartes’ idea of art?
What does he value it for? How does his conception relate to
what the ancients (Plato and Aristotle) had to say about art?
Listen to CD Two Selection 7, Bach, The Art of the Fugue.
Then write an analysis of the piece describing both its
intrinsic and extrinsic meaning. First, transcribe your
reaction and impressions. How does the piece hang together?
How does this open form of music differ from a closed one? What
characterizes the age of Bach in music and arts in general? How
does the historical context influence the piece?
Research team meetings |
Read : Sporre: Ch. 4 "Music" (91-117).
Fiero: Ch. 23 “The Scientific revolution and New Learning”
(581-99).
Research for first paper. |
4
|
4, 6, 9, 10. |
Midterm Exam
Review of last week's online work
Quiz 3
Topics for discussion:
Ethical issues and what it means to be human. Works of
literature, film, television, music, or art dealing with ethical
dilemmas. Focus on narrative and realism. Discuss
epistemological issues. Terminology about literature.
.
Q & A |
Read Lecture 4
Threaded discussions
Compare the passages from John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant.
Pay particular attention to the notions of necessity and
contingency. Find one or two examples to illustrate the
difference between their concepts of morality.
Have a look at the passage from ch. 30 of Flaubert’s Madame
Bovary. The passage can be analyzed in many ways: from the
stylistic point of view, from a social point of view, or from an
ethical one. How do all these aspects work together? What
peculiarities of the style indicate the bourgeois life Emma
leads and how does the bourgeois environment account for her
amoral attitude?
Research team meetings |
Read: Sporre: Ch. 10 "Literature" (226-249).
Fiero: Ch. 30 “Industry, Empire and the Realist Style”
(749-85).
Research for 2nd paper
Paper 1 due
|
5
|
6, 7. |
Review of last week's online work
Review paper 1
Quiz 4
Topics for discussion:
Identity and Character. Focus on Romanticism and also on modern
quests for identity. Discuss Romantic representations of the
self. Compare to modern representations of identity. Learn
terminology for cinema
Q & A |
Read Lecture 5
Threaded discussions
Have a look at the way Victor Hugo builds up the character of
Jean Valjean. How does the passage reflect romantic conceptions
of self? Use both the lecture on line and Fiero’s chapter.
Rent and view one of the more recent Frankenstein movies. Why
has Mary Shelley’s work captured the modern imagination? What
identity issues emerge from the story of the monster?
Research team meetings |
Read: Sporre: Ch. 6 "Cinema" (141-158).
Fiero: 28 “The Romantic Hero” (705-25).
Research for 3rd paper
Paper 2 due
|
6
|
9, 10 |
Review of last week's online work
Review Paper 2
Quiz 5
Topics for discussion:
The quest for race and gender equality. African American
identity. Feminisms and ethical issues. African American arts
and literature. Feminist art and literature.
Q & A |
Read Lecture 6
Threaded discussions
View Do the Right Thing by Spike Lee. What African
American political issues are illustrated by the film and how?
Do you think Spike Lee does them justice? What is his view on
political matters and how does he express it?
Consider the excerpt from an interview given by French
intellectual Luce Irigaray.
What tensions with the feminist movement become apparent in her
response?
Research team meetings |
Fiero: Ch. 36 “Identity and Liberation” (913-43).
Research for final project
Paper 3 due
|
7
|
7, 9 |
Term Paper
Review of last week's online work.
Review Paper 3
Quiz 6
Topics for discussion:
New Forms of art generated by emerging technologies.
Representations of technology in Sci-Fi and film. Technology and
new philosophical trends.
Preparation for next week's Final
Research team presentations
Q & A |
Read Lecture 7
Threaded discussions
Have a look at what Heidegger has to say in the excerpt. Bear
in mind, this was written before the existence of computers. In
what way can language become like a machine? What are the
consequences of the possible transformation of language into a
machine? What kind of fears is Heidegger haunted by? What
science fiction works develop similar ideas?
The boundary between process and product, and between theater
and visual arts, has become blurred in the last fifty years.
What roles might modern film, television, and computers have
played in these developments?
Research team meetings |
Read : Fiero: Ch. 38 “Image and Sound in the Information Age”
(957-86).
Each team will prepare its historical period and present.
Submit the Research Report after the research team presentations |
8 |
Course summary |
Final Exam
|
Threaded discussion
Q & A postings |
Submit the class project after the research team presentations
Proctored Final Exam |
|
|
|
Grading Policy |
There
are 4 ways (each valued at 25% of the total grade) in which students can
earn grade points in this class:
1.
Weekly Online Threaded Discussions
2. Research paper
3. Midterm Exam
4. Final Exam
Based upon the percentage of points that each student earns, grades are
allocated as follows:
Letter Grade |
Percentage |
A |
90 to 100% |
B |
80 to 89% |
C |
70 to 79% |
D |
60 to 69% |
F |
Below 60% |
|
|
|
Course Policies and Procedures |
LATE AND MISSED WORK COURSE POLICY
It is the policy of this Professor not to accept late work or assist
students in making up missed work. In an accelerated, compressed 8-week
course, students must prepare in advance of the start of the class to
arrive to EACH class on time and to not miss any class. The only
exception to this policy is that the Professor will accept a written,
verifiable medical excuse from a health care professional for a
specified period of lateness or absence and shall then reserve the right
to examine each student situation, on a case-by-case basis, in order
to decide if the given student is eligible to complete specially
assigned work created by the Professor. The Professor always will
strive to be fair to students, but students, must also seriously commit
themselves to our brief 8-week class expectations.
ONLINE THREADED DISCUSSION BEHAVIOR GUIDELINES
While participating in our two threaded discussions each week, it is
expected that all students will abide by the common rules of decency
listed below in order to maintain a professional online learning
environment. The threaded discussions ARE NOT LIKE A CHAT ROOM
DISCUSSION.
1. Always try to talk in warm, friendly tone, open to the ideas of
others.
2. Do not dominate or try to lead any discussion.
3. Listen to the others in a discussion by carefully reading and
reflecting on their input before responding back to them.
4. Do not solely respond to the Professor's remarks, but also
respond/initiate discussion with the other students.
5. Always speak respectfully to the other discussion participants,
avoiding using any profanity, inappropriate, offensive, and derogatory
language. Also, do not use slang or cyber talk vocabulary.
6. Always bring in weekly lecture and reading content materials,
avoiding frequent personal opinion statements.
7. Bring into the discussion real-life examples that are relevant and
helpful to the discussion, especially examples from the business world.
8. Reserve all questions for the separate Questions and Answers section
of each week's Threaded Discussion area.
9. Actively display a healthy sense of humor!!
THE
WEEKLY GRADING STANDARDS USED TO EVALUATE THE TDAS
The Threaded Discussion Assignment is a major online component of the
iOptimize shell. The TDA is a weekly asynchronous virtual classroom
discussion aimed at promoting understanding of the major concepts and
principles underlying the complex relationships of the course. Students
should plan to participate in the discussion(s) for approximately two
hours each week (this time does not include homework for the onsite
meetings).
The Professor will lead these discussions, asking questions, promoting
thought, and providing feedback to the students. In turn, each student
is expected to respond to the instructor’s questions and to respond to
the entries of the other students in the class. Opinions are welcome;
however, the entries as well as the discussion itself must focus on the
weekly lecture(s) and weekly readings. Thus each student
must
refer to specifics of the lectures and the readings each week as well as
analyze and synthesize material from previous readings and lectures.
The Threaded Discussion will be weighted between 15%-20% of the total
course grade.
Each week the student will be graded on his/her contribution(s) in the
Threaded Discussions using the TDA Grading Criteria. Each entry is worth
a maximum of five points based on the following three categories.
Grading the Threaded Discussion Assignment
Frequency
– At a minimum, each student
must
participate 3 days per week, every other day, spread out from the
beginning to the end of each week. The more a student participates, the
more points the student is able to earn. The points for frequency in
the discussion can range from 0-2 points (0 for no participation and 2
points maximum for the 3 or more days).
Volume
– (The number of posts per Thread) For each Thread in a TDA, a minimum
of three postings
must
be made by each student per week. These postings cannot be completely
directed only to the professor; the postings must also respond to the
entries and comments of the other students in the class in the virtual
classroom discussion. The more entries the student posts during the
three days the more points the student can earn. The student may earn 0
– 2 points for each entry.
Quality
– It is expected that each student will bring content from the weekly
lectures and weekly readings during each TDA (adding value including
personal examples, new analysis, important questions, tying posts
together, references to reading, responding to the instructor and/or the
questions). While personal opinions may be interjected, the emphasis of
each discussion is the course content. A student can earn from 0-1
point for the quality of the discussion entries.
Therefore, a student can earn a total of 15 points (maximum) per
Threaded Discussion Assignment/Topic if they meet the criteria for
Threaded Discussion. If there are two Threaded Discussions per week the
student would be able to earn 30 points (maximum) in the Threads for the
Week.
You will get 5 points for the Introduction Thread in Week One.
Therefore the total maximum for week 1 will be 20 point. The Wrap-Up
Thread for each week is NOT a graded component. |
|
|
School Policies |
A)
Academic and Professional Conduct
Ensuring academic integrity is an educational objective DeVry takes very
seriously. The School's Academic Policy is printed in the catalog, and
the following explanations may be helpful in interpreting what are
considered to be violations of the policy.
Students have a responsibility to maintain both the academic and
professional integrity of the School and to meet the highest standards
of academic and professional conduct. Students are expected to do their
own work on examinations, class preparation and assignments and to
conduct themselves professionally when interacting with fellow students,
faculty and staff. Students must also make equitable contributions to
both the quality and quantity of work performed on group projects.
Academic and/or professional misconduct is subject to disciplinary
action including course failure, probation or dismissal. Academic
dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, cheating on examinations,
plagiarism, bribery, falsification of student records and improper
attempts to influence Instructors or School officials.
Examinations:
Using notes, looking at another student's test paper, or providing
another student with answers during an examination are violations of the
policy.
Course Assignments/Projects:
Unless a course assignment is specifically designated as a group/team
assignment, collaborating with another student in completing assignments
intended to be completed independently or submitting another student's
work as your own are violations of the policy.
Research Reports:
To use another person's ideas, words, expressions, or findings in your
writing without acknowledging the source is to plagiarize. A writer who
does not give appropriate credit when quoting, or even paraphrasing,
another's writing is guilty of plagiarism and in violation of the
Academic Policy.
The policies and procedures set forth in the DeVry Handbook will be the
guide for standards of conduct, including cheating, plagiarism, grading
and other policies.
Students should adhere to the same types of conduct for cheating,
plagiarism, etc. that are followed in the traditional classroom.
Students should be familiar with the consequences of cheating,
plagiarism, or rules infractions as set out in the DeVry Handbook.
B)
Computer Virus Disclaimer
“Students have a responsibility to maintain both the academic and
professional integrity of the School, and to meet the highest standards
of academic and professional conduct." Any intentional, willful or
reckless transferring of viruses, as the result of an email message or
attachment will be considered professional misconduct. Professional
misconduct is subject to disciplinary action including being placed on
probation, failing a graded course component, failing a course, or being
dismissed from the School. DeVry will not be liable to any affected
student for any indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages
that may occur as a result of this type of misconduct by any person.
Faculty and DeVry staff have a responsibility to maintain both the
academic and professional integrity of the School, and to meet the
highest standards of academic and professional conduct. Any
intentional, willful or reckless transferring of viruses, as the result
of an email message or attachment will be considered professional
misconduct. Professional misconduct is subject to disciplinary action.
DeVry will not be liable to any affected person or organization for any
indirect, special, incidental or consequential damages that may occur as
a result of this type of misconduct by any person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|